Thursday, December 14, 2017

This week's ongoing Biblical teaching will be part 3 of Luke chapter 22

Jesus On the Cross
[Luke chapter 23, verses 32-43]
To view this on my web site, click here :-)



 Last week when we ended our ongoing study of the writings of the apostle Luke, we left off at verse 31 of chapter 23, where Jesus was being led off to be crucified. A crowd of people followed after him, mourners who knew his fate and who wept and wailed at the sight of our Lord and Savior. No wonder! By this time Jesus had been beaten with fists and whipped with a whip with multiple cords on it for the maximum and most gruesome effect. Jesus had been beaten so badly he was nearly unrecognizable. And he hadn't even been crucified yet! This week we will pick up at verse 32, Jesus is being nailed to the cross in what has to be the saddest part of the Bible. But it's only that way on the surface of things as they stand, because of what will happen three days later. So let's all get started, OK?


Two other men, both criminals, were also led out with him to be executed. When they came to the place called the Skull, there they crucified him along with the criminals – one on his right, the other on his left. Jesus said, 'Father forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing.' And they divided up his clothes by casting lots. The people stood watching, and the rulers even sneered at him. They said, 'He saved others, let him save himself if he is the Christ of God, the Chosen One.' The soldiers also came up and mocked him. They offered wine vinegar and said, 'If you are the King of the Jews, save yourself.'” (Luke 23, verses 32-37)


In the Bible's original Hebrew-to-Greek translation that occurred about the turn of the 2nd century AD, the word for “the place called the Skull” is 'Golgotha', the word from which the modern term 'Gothic' has its roots. Although I've never been there myself, I understand this place is a hill with what appears to be the upper half of a human skull on one side of it, with just the eyes and nose visible along with a prominent crown. So our Lord and Savior was crucified that day in between two criminals who had received the death penalty, presumably for murder or attempting insurrection against the Roman Empire who ruled the Middle East of that time with an iron hand, or some other capital offense. They crucified Jesus Christ as a common criminal, but he was also crucified because he was viewed as a threat to the establishment. Although our Redeemer didn't set out to be one, Jesus ended up receiving capital punishment for being a revolutionary. A revolutionary for what, you ask? Jesus preached and taught all about equality, an issue that some people are just now figuring out after 2,000 years. He taught that God had a Son who was an intermediary between God and humankind, something previously unheard of. He accused the religious establishment of his day of apostasy, of misleading the people and of spiritual dereliction of duty because they were so hypocritical. When he overturned the tables and chairs of the money-changers in the Temple before driving them out with a whip he had made, that was just the icing on the cake that was the Lord's ministry – a wedding cake! This would be a wedding cake for his Bride, who is the church. The fact that Jesus used a home made whip to drive them out of the Temple was the primary reason Jesus was whipped so badly on the morning of his crucifixion.


Despite everything that was being done to him, all our Savior could say was, “'Father forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing.' And they divided up his clothes by casting lots.” OK, let's all get some perspective on this. Jesus is in the process of being nailed to a cross. He has already been bound to the cross with rope to hold his hands and feet down to keep them firmly in place, so that when they drove the nails through it would be impossible for him to move. Plus, there were soldiers there holding Jesus' limbs in place anyhow. The pain must have been excruciating to the point of being off the scale. Jesus had already been beaten half to death, even to the point where someone else had to be commandeered to carry his cross. And yet, instead of calling those who were driving those nails every curse or swear word ever invented like any of us would have done (including myself), or screaming out in pain, “Why? Why?”, Jesus simply asked his Father in heaven to forgive them. I'm sure he was crying out in pain as he did so, which makes this all the more remarkable. Even as the Roman soldiers gambled for his clothes – meaning Jesus was hanging on the cross in his underwear in early to mid April in early to mid morning, with the air temperature ranging from the upper forties to near 60 degrees Fahrenheit – Jesus asked the Father to forgive them anyway, even while his teeth chattered in the chilly Passover morning air that day.


The people stood watching, and the rulers even sneered at him. They said, 'He saved others, let him save himself....” By “the rulers”, I'm sure the apostle Luke meant the Temple rulers as well as the governing authorities there in Jerusalem. For three and a half years the religious leadership of that day – the Pharisees, Sadducee's, the Chief Priests and teachers of the Law – had expended enormous time and resources following Jesus around, testing him and trying every way they knew how to trip Jesus up, or to catch him in a contradiction, or to find an angle from which to attack him from a Biblical standpoint. Now they had Jesus right where they wanted him – nailed to that cross ten feet up in the air, with his fate as Lord, Eternal Savior and Kinsman Redeemer of all humankind sealed for all eternity! This is why we go to church every Sunday: To honor Jesus' supreme sacrifice that he made on the cross for all of us by dying in our place for our sins against God. Whether we intended to sin or not is besides the point – we have all still sinned at least once in our lives. When it comes to God, even one sin is too much because God is purity personified. Sin, on the other hand, however innocent or harmless or fun it may have seemed at the time, causes us to fall short of the glory of God. So although Jesus declined to save himself when he was challenged to do so, it was because this was destined for 3 days into the future, something no one else understood at that time. And now let's conclude today's study starting at verse 38.


There was a written notice above him which read: 'This is the King of the Jews'. One of the criminals who hung there with him hurled insults at him: 'Aren't you the Christ? Save yourself and us!' But the other criminal rebuked him. 'Don't you fear God', he said, 'since you are under the same sentence? We are punished justly, for we are getting what our deeds deserve. But this man has done nothing wrong.' Then he said, 'Jesus, remember me when you come into your kingdom.' Jesus answered him, 'I tell you the truth, today you will be with me in paradise.'” (Luke 23, verses 38-43)


The message in these last few verses is unmistakable! It doesn't matter who condemns, insults or attacks you if God is still on your side. It doesn't matter who you are, or what you have done (or not), or where you have been – not even as a condemned criminal hanging on a cross right next to God's promised Messiah or Anointed One, right where he can see you. Jesus isn't interested in your background. In fact, he really couldn't care less about that, in my estimation. What Jesus is most interested in is your destination in eternity. Jesus isn't interested in your past, he's focused on your future. Another thing that stands out here is the stark contrast between the two criminals Jesus was crucified with. One of them taunted Jesus because he hadn't saved himself and the others. But then, “....the other criminal rebuked him. 'Don't you fear God', he said, 'since you are under the same sentence? We are punished justly, for we are getting what our deeds deserve. But this man has done nothing wrong.” One recognized Jesus as being not only an innocent man, but also as being the Son of God, or the Jewish Messiah, depending on your point of view. The other condemned man clearly did not, as you read. Prior to this, neither had followed Jesus even though they likely had both heard of him. But it was not until they met on the day they were crucified that the two criminals had a decision to make – a decision for or against Christ. Do we believe in Him or not?


“Don't you fear God?”, asked the second condemned prisoner to the first. He was likely quoting the Bible when he asked that question: “The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge, but fools despise wisdom and discipline.” (Proverbs 1: 7) What followed was one of the most memorable exchanges between Jesus and those he saved. “Then he said, 'Jesus, remember me when you come into your kingdom.' Jesus answered him, 'I tell you the truth, today you will be with me in paradise.'” The man on the cross who asked Jesus to remember him – effectively asking for his final absolution – was the one whose soul got saved. We can safely conclude that it was the contrite heart as well as the faith of the second man that saved his soul. It wasn't because he led a great life, because he had not. He was a condemned criminal. But his willingness to take responsibility for his sins and his expressed faith in Jesus as the man who would save his soul – that is what saved him. And that, in the end, is all that can save our souls. Our deeds can't save us, no matter how well intentioned and numerous they may be. Nevertheless we are commanded by Christ to “love your neighbor as yourself”. Moreover, a complete lack of faith will condemn us no matter how much we may selflessly help others. Our deeds can't help us there either – unless they are combined with unwavering faith in Jesus Christ as our living, risen Savior. And next week we'll move on to part 4 of Luke chapter 23.


Sunday, December 10, 2017

What the 'Fake News' Media Hasn't Told You About the Wildfires in California and Elsewhere

Various Wildfires in the Bible
by Web Pastor Paul J. Bern
To view this on my website, click here :-)



Everything in the world is in agitation. The signs of the times are ominous. Coming events cast their shadows long before their arrival. The Spirit of God is withdrawing from the earth, and calamity follows calamity by sea and by land. There are hurricanes, tornado's, earthquakes, deadly wildfires, floods, mass shootings and murders of every description. Who can read the future? Where is security? There is assurance in nothing that is human or earthly. The only true security can be found in Jesus Christ. When our lives are over and our bodies inevitably wear out and die, we can't take any of our stuff with us. Too many people live their lives to see how much they can accumulate while they're still here. What we should be doing instead is to live our lives to see how much of a legacy we leave behind when we're dead and gone.



Isaiah 30 verse 27 says, “See, the name of the Lord comes from afar, with burning anger and dense clouds of smoke; his lips are full of wrath, and his tongue is a consuming fire.” One of the things that impressed me most about the west coast wildfires is they can spread faster than a human can run. That is, they can overtake and consume someone who is trying to flee without a vehicle. God's Word, the Bible in whatever format or version you choose, is a “consuming fire” that spares nothing and no one, even to the very soul! The fires of hell are just as real as those wildfires you've been watching on the news, or preferably on Alternative Media. Jesus said as much in Matthew 5 verse 22: “....I tell you that anyone who is angry with his brother will be subject to judgment. Again, anyone who says to his brother, 'Raca', is answerable to the Sanhedrin. But anyone who says, 'you fool!' will be in danger of the fire of hell.” “Raca” is an Arabic gesture of contempt, like calling someone an expletive or talking down to them as if they are worthless. That person may well seem worthless to their accuser, but the accuser forgets that God made them both.



In Mark's gospel chapter 9, verse 43 mentions the fires of hell too. “If your hand causes you to sin, cut it off. It is better for you to enter life maimed than with two hands to go to hell, where the fire never goes out.” Wildfires, no matter how out of control they may become, are all eventually put out. Not so with the fires of hell. And if Jesus tells us that hell is a real place, you had best believe it is because Jesus cannot lie – it's just not possible for the Son of God to do that. In the same way that none of us could swim in a swimming pool filled with hydrochloric acid, Jesus cannot lie any more than a house cat can transform itself into a leopard. So hell is real, and any person who says otherwise is in a state of denial. No apologies. The apostle Paul wrote about what occurs in instances like the California wildfires, or the huge hurricanes we had earlier this year, when people put their faith in the wrong things. “....his work will be shown for what it is, because the Day will bring it to the light. It will be revealed with fire, and fire will test the quality of each man's work. If what he has built survives, he will receive his reward. If it is burned up, he will suffer loss; he himself will be saved, but only as one escaping through the flames.



“The Day” is a reference to the Biblical return of Jesus to reign forever here on earth. The “Day of the Lord”, as the Bible calls it, will be marked by the wholesale destruction of everything man-made. Just as God destroyed the earth once before by the Great Flood, as he destroyed earth before with water he will soon destroy again with fire. Our legacies cannot be consumed by fire, only our material goods, together with ourselves in a worst case scenario. “If what he has built survives, he will receive his reward. If it is burned up, he will suffer loss; he himself will be saved, but only as one escaping through the flames.” Just as those who made it through the ferocious fires out in California escaped with only the clothes on their backs, so those who hoard possessions and wealth in this life will have the least in the next, if they make it to be with the Lord at all! You materialistic people – you know who you are – are living your lives all wrong! Some don't realize it and others just don't care. As a famous preacher once said, “People who don't care leave holes in time.” One final thought just below about the California wildfires, and that will be all for this week. Be blessed in Jesus' mighty name!

The Jerusalem Fire, a Sign or Coincidence?






Commentary By: Gordon King at https://endtimebibleprophecy.wordpress.com
Signs of the times, or mere coincidence? I don’t know, you be the judge.
This year has been a year of devastation and disaster as we see not only economic, social, and political disaster, but also man-made and natural disaster.
We see wildfires all across the Western United States, huge massive fires endangering lives, causing mass evacuations, and threatening property.
One of these fires located in Northern California is named “The Jerusalem Fire”.
I am not saying that this is a sign, yet isn’t it odd, the Jerusalem fire? Jerusalem, the middle of controversy for the entire world. Jerusalem, “it shall be a burdensome stone”. It’s something to think about.
If it’s not a sign, then it should at the least be a wake up call! Things in the world are just not right, the world is on fire! And the center of the world, Jerusalem, is in the middle of a fire storm.
Don’t take my word for it, read the holy scriptures, the Bible, see for yourself what the Lord says regarding the end times.


God bless! Maranatha! To view the original article on the Web, click here!

Wednesday, December 6, 2017

This week's ongoing Bible study will be part 2 of Luke chapter 23

An Innocent Man is Condemned

[Luke chapter 23, verses 13-31]
To view this on my website, click here :-)




Last week when we left off at verse 12 of chapter 23, King Herod II of Judea had just presided over Jesus being brought before him to be accused by those who sought to have him killed. After making a mockery of our Lord and Savior – after Jesus did the same to Herod by refusing to respond to Herod's line of questioning – King Herod sends Jesus back to Pilate with a big flowing robe that was not becoming of our Lord and Savior at all! Although the exact details are lost to history and antiquity, we can assume this robe made Christ look like a clown and not a King. There is, of course, a price to be paid for treating people so shamefully, especially when it's the Son of God. Today as we take up where we left off, Pontius Pilate has just convened another hearing upon Jesus' return. So let's all get started at verse 13.


Pilate called together the chief priests, the rulers and the people, and said to them, 'You brought me this man as one who was inciting the people to rebellion. I examined him in your presence and have found no basis for the charges against him. Neither has Herod, for he sent him back to us; as you can see, he has done nothing to deserve death. Therefore I will punish him and then release him.' With one voice they cried out, 'Away with this man! Release Barabbas to us!' (Barabbas had been thrown into prison for insurrection in the city, and for murder.) Wanting to release Jesus, Pilate appealed to them again. But they kept shouting, 'Crucify him! Crucify him!' For the third time he spoke to them. 'Why? What crime has this man committed? I have found in him no grounds for the death penalty. Therefore I will punish him and then release him.' But with loud shouts they insistently demanded that he be crucified, and the shouts prevailed. So Pilate decided to grant their demand. He released the man who had been thrown into prison for insurrection and murder, the one they asked for, and surrendered Jesus to their will.” (Luke 23, verses 13-25)


We already know that Pilate didn't want to be bothered with Jesus, and that he regarded him as being more of a nuisance than anything else. Back in the days of the Roman Empire the emperors were worshiped as gods, and there were numerous Roman gods as well. So to Pilate, the very idea of someone being called 'the Son of God' must have seemed like a novelty to him at best, or maybe more like a curiosity. At any rate, Pilate plainly told the crowd he was finding Jesus not guilty as charged when he told them, “....as you can see, he has done nothing to deserve death. Therefore I will punish him and then release him.” At this point it's business as usual for Pilate, just another day at the office. And Pilate is telling the crowd, led by the Jewish Temple authorities, exactly who was in charge. He also was telling them he thought their charges against Jesus were completely over-the-top, which they most certainly were. But this was no ordinary day in Pilate's courts.


Abruptly and in unison, the people again demanded the release of Barabbas, but Pilate was unwilling. Evidently he thought Barabbas was a much bigger threat than Jesus Christ. Once again, on this count Pontius Pilate was absolutely right. “Wanting to release Jesus, Pilate appealed to them again. But they kept shouting, 'Crucify him! Crucify him!' For the third time he spoke to them. 'Why? What crime has this man committed? I have found in him no grounds for the death penalty.'” Pilate was now worried that he might have to condemn a man who should not receive capital punishment under Roman law. He worried that he might have a riot on his hands, something that would not have gone well with his superiors. In fact, Pilate had at this point tried twice to acquit Jesus and let him go, but was unsuccessful because the crowd had surrounded Jesus by now. This crowd of Jesus' accusers had become so agitated that they posed a direct threat to Jesus' safety, and by extension to Pilate himself. You can be sure one of the guards in Pilate's court had slipped out before this time to send for reinforcements. Jesus' accusers now outnumbered the authorities by a substantial margin, posing a significant threat to the court.


“....with loud shouts they insistently demanded that he be crucified, and the shouts prevailed. So Pilate decided to grant their demand.” Pilate caved in to the demands of the crowd, sacrificing Jesus' life in order to save his reputation and preserve his authority. Otherwise, he likely reasoned, he would be viewed by Rome as being expendable, and as being weak by those he governed. It was probably right about this time that the reinforcements I mentioned in the paragraph above arrived on the scene. And now let's move on to the second part of our study, beginning at verse 26.


As they led him away, they seized Simon from Cyrene, who was on his way in from the country, and put the cross on him and made him carry it behind Jesus. A large number of people followed him, including women who had mourned and wailed for him. Jesus turned and said to them, 'Daughters of Jerusalem, do not weep for me; weep for yourselves and for your children. For the time will come when you will say, 'Blessed are the barren women, the wombs that never bore and the breasts that never nursed!' Then 'they will say to the mountains, 'Fall on us!' and to the hills, 'Cover us!'. For if men will do these things when the tree is green, what will happen when it is dry?'” (Luke 23, verses 26-31)


Verse 26 differs from other Biblical accounts of the details of Jesus' crucifixion, mainly the Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches. They teach that Jesus had to carry his own cross, and that he fell three times while carrying it. According to the Vatican's account, it was only after Christ fell for the third time that Simon was compelled to carry Jesus' cross for him. This was symbolic of the number 3 being associated with the crucifixion of Christ, which is an occult symbol as well as in Christian Biblical numerology, which is why the Protestant denominations use the Biblical narrative that I'm using in place of the other. The problem with this is that it's just not true. What is true is that Jesus could not physically carry the cross because he had been beaten, whipped and otherwise physically abused to the point of exhaustion. Jesus literally had insufficient strength, because he had lost too much blood, to be strong enough to carry it. So, the Roman soldiers made Simon from Cyrene carry it instead. Let's not forget that this was a roughly made wooden cross big enough to hang a 175 pound man's body on to it. So you can be sure that this cross was very heavy, certainly well over 100 pounds, possibly weighing as much as 200.


In the same way that the (temporarily) condemned Jesus could not carry his cross, needing the assistance of a stranger, all of humankind cannot carry their crosses of guilt and shame, needing the risen Christ to carry all that for us. This is one of the profound truths of the Gospel that can never be diluted nor diminished. Jesus the risen Lord and Redeemer has borne the weight of all our sins on the cross of Golgotha. “A large number of people followed him, including women who had mourned and wailed for him. Jesus turned and said to them, 'Daughters of Jerusalem, do not weep for me; weep for yourselves and for your children.'” Jesus told them plainly they needed to weep and wail for their kids and grand-kids because of the condemnation that was now upon that current generation. They had all better hope, he was telling them, that their children would escape God's wrath that was to come.


Then 'they will say to the mountains, 'Fall on us!' and to the hills, 'Cover us!'. For if men will do these things when the tree is green, what will happen when it is dry?'” Jesus was quoting from Hosea chapter 10 verse 8, which is a prophecy yet to be fulfilled. It refers to the End Times or the Last Days, when people will beg God to cover them from the oncoming wrath of God, the exact nature of which is still not entirely clear. But the Bible gives us a lot of hints and clues, some of which came from the Lord himself. “The Son of Man”, he said, “will come at an hour when you do not expect him.” There will be another world war that will kill at least 2.1 billion people. There will be an economic collapse, and the capitalist economic system will fall. Something like a meteor or a comet will hit the central Atlantic ocean, killing all the fish in the sea by contaminating the water, followed by a global earthquake of previously unheard-of proportions. All these things are coming, but not just yet. So in the meantime let's continue to get ourselves ready during this holiday season for His return for his Bride. And let's not forget that his supreme Sacrifice for us all is the real 'reason for the season'.

Sunday, December 3, 2017

THE WORLD IN 2018: The Prophecy Warning... (2017-2018 EVENTS)

Shame On All the Sex Predators! Out -- all of you, OUT!!

Humiliation and Shame for Sex Perverts is Deserved
by pastor Paul J. Bern
To view this on my website, click here :-)




I don't have to explain my topic for this week. Everybody has been watching or hearing about what has been going on in the halls of power in Washington as well as in Hollywood. Accusations of sexual assault, or lewd acts, or of randomly exposing oneself to whomever have suddenly started boiling to the surface. It started with former New York congressman Anthony Wiener, and he is now paying a very high price for his indiscretions in the form of a 21-month stint in federal prison. This was followed just a few months later by disclosure in Hollywood of producer-director Harvey Weinstien being accused of multiple counts of unwanted sexual advances and even outright assaults. Then several more Hollywood directors disclosed of their own sexual indiscretions, presumably to keep from being humiliated, followed by the flap over actor Kevin Spacey's allegedly uncontrollable sexual advances. While all this has been going on, president Trump has been accused by at least 20 women of unwanted sexual advances. Most recently, formerly popular Matt Lauer, the morning “Today” show host, was abruptly fired for his own incredibly poor judgment in failing to contain his own sexual appetites. On and on this goes, and where it stops nobody knows – except God.


My favorite book – the Bible – has plenty to say about sexual immorality. Everybody knows that, although not everyone believes in it. Allow me to name a couple of examples, and then I'd like to list a few bad things that can happen when we will not or cannot control our own sexual desires. First Corinthians chapter 6, verses 12 and 13 says, “'Everything is permissible for me' – but not everything is beneficial. 'Food for the stomach and the stomach for food' – but God will destroy them both. The body is not meant for sexual immorality, but for the Lord, and the Lord for the body.'” Having multiple sex partners in the times in which we live can be downright dangerous in a worst case scenario, particularly if your partner is already married or living with someone without telling you so. We think he/she is single but they're not, and next thing you know you-know-who comes home, and there you are. Some say, “Well, I don't care for the bar scene, so I use dating services to help me locate Mr. or Ms. Right so I can screen people first”. Let me point out that, according to data from the CDC located right here in Atlanta, 1 out of every 5 people on the dating websites have an STD. Out of those individuals, fully 80% don't bother to tell their new partners they are infected. You can imagine how that will turn out for everyone involved! The moral here is that, while we have the free will to do whatever we want, there can be an extremely high price to be paid when we abuse it.


Another example can be found further down in the same chapter of 1st Corinthians, verses 18-20, which read, “Flee from sexual immorality. All other sins a man commits are outside his body, but he who sins sexually sins against his own body. Do you not know that your body is a Temple of the Holy Spirit, who is in you, who you have received from God? You are not your own; you were bought at a price. Therefore honor God with your body.” The word 'flee' means to turn and run away from something or someone who poses a clear and present danger to yourself or your livelihood – even your very life! What happens during mass shootings? People turn and run for their lives, and that's exactly what we should do with regards to sexual immorality. That hot new partner you just stumbled upon could end up slowly killing you slowly long after the lovemaking is over – very, very slowly, in fact – with some STD that the newly infected person probably never heard of.


One final example I feel should be mentioned on the topic of sexual sins and perversion can be found in 1st Thessalonians chapter 5, verse 3, and I quote: “But among you there should not be even a hint of sexual immorality, or of any kind of impurity, or of greed, because these are improper for God's holy people.” OK, right here it is in black and white, everyone! God ranks having multiple partners right up there with the top 1% and all their insatiable greed. You know, they have 99% of America's wealth, while the remaining 99% are left with the remaining 1% – those people? Think of how much you likely despise those people, and that's how offended God is with our sexual immorality (Never mind how offended God is with their greed. I've already covered that topic extensively, and I will do so again, God willing!). This includes people – and particularly those who self-identify as 'Christians' – who hang out at nude or topless clubs, who look at porn, and in many cases even the singles bars should be off-limits to true Christian believers who are single. If anyone feels so lonesome that they would go to a night club and risk getting shot or stabbed just to find someone to love, I've got a news flash for those individuals – you won't find that special someone there. All you'll meet are a bunch of drunks, and who wants that? Those who truly desire a soul-mate should ask God to send him or her to you. Believe me, when the time is right, he will.


The apostle Paul, who wrote all the quotes I'm using today including this last one, said it best in this regard: “Now to the unmarried and the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I am. But if they cannot control themselves, they should marry, for it is better to marry than to burn with passion.” (1st Corinthians chapter 7, verses 8-9) Anyone who is really burning up with that much passion should go ahead and find a spouse to keep themselves from sinning – there is nothing wrong with this at all. But none of us – I am single myself – will find our future spouses on-line, or in some bar, no matter how fancy or attractive they may seem. Moreover, you will never find him or her watching porn either! If anyone really wants a spouse, they should pray to God to send them one, because when we do, and those prayers are made with the utmost sincerity, God will answer that prayer. That's one thing I know for sure. The other thing that we have all seen for ourselves on the news and other media is that, when we cannot contain or refuse to curb our sexual proclivities – or if certain people think they can get away with their unwanted sexual advances because of their status, wealth, or both – those days just came to a sudden and dramatic end! I, for one, am glad this has occurred. It happened for the good of our country and for ourselves. This series of incidents has proven conclusively that sexual immorality, when carried to its extremes, will destroy the lives of the perpetrators. Chalk one up for gender equality, for mutual respect, and for Jesus Christ, the originator of gender equality.

Friday, December 1, 2017

Discoveries of Ancient Relics that Do Not Fit The Time or Place

Free Book Excerpt #16 from Blogger and Author Rev. Paul J. Bern


legalization cover 1

Another free sample from the latest book offering from Rev. Paul J. Bern; “Cannabis Legalization and the Bible: Compatible Or Not?”

Watch the video https://youtu.be/o_UXdIsBuf8



The United States likes to portray itself as the “Land of the Free”, yet a 2013 study by the ACLU found that one out of three people in the United States are arrested by the time they are 23! 1 out 3 arrested by the time they are 23?!? You want some more shameful stats? Last year there were more than 1.6 million people arrested on drug charges and over half of those arrests were for marijuana possession alone. With so many of our citizens in prison compared with the rest of the world, there are only two possibilities: Either we are home to the most evil people on earth or we are doing something much different – and vastly counterproductive. Obviously, the answer is the latter. It is time to find an exit strategy from our 40 year old war on drugs that is unquestionably a failure. Here's a few examples:


  • There are more African American adults under correctional control today – in prison or jail, on probation or parole – than were enslaved in 1850, a decade before the Civil War began.
  • As of 2004, more African American men were disenfranchised (due to felon disenfranchisement laws) than in 1870, the year the Fifteenth Amendment was ratified, prohibiting laws that explicitly deny the right to vote on the basis of race.
  • A black child born today is less likely to be raised by both parents than a black child born during slavery. The recent disintegration of the African American family is due in large part to the mass imprisonment of black fathers.
  • If you take into account prisoners, a large majority of African American men in some urban areas have been labeled felons for life. (In the Chicago area, the figure is nearly 80%.) These men are part of a growing under-caste – not class, caste – permanently relegated by law to a second-class status. They can be denied the right to vote, automatically excluded from juries, and legally discriminated against in employment, housing, access to education, and public benefits, much as their grandparents and great-grandparents were during the Jim Crow era.


The drug war has been brutal – complete with SWAT teams, tanks, bazookas, grenade launchers, and sweeps of entire neighborhoods – but those who live in white communities have little clue to the devastation wrought. This war has been waged almost exclusively in poor communities of color, even though studies consistently show that people of all colors use and sell illegal drugs at remarkably similar rates. In fact, some studies indicate that white youth are significantly more likely to engage in illegal drug dealing than black youth. Any notion that drug use among African Americans is more severe or dangerous is nullified by the data. White youth, for example, have about three times the number of drug-related visits to the emergency room as their African American counterparts. That is not what you would guess, though, when entering our nation’s prisons and jails, overflowing as they are with black and brown drug offenders. In some states, African Americans comprise 80%-90% of all drug offenders sent to prison. This is the point at which I am typically interrupted and reminded that black men have higher rates of violent crime. That’s why the drug war is waged in poor communities of color and not middle-class suburbs.


But what about all those violent criminals and drug kingpins? Isn’t the drug war waged in ghetto communities because that’s where the violent offenders can be found? The answer is yes – in made-for-TV movies. In real life, the answer is no. The drug war has never been focused on rooting out drug kingpins or violent offenders. Federal funding flows to those agencies that increase dramatically the volume of drug arrests, not the agencies most successful in bringing down the bosses. What gets rewarded in this war is sheer numbers of drug arrests. To make matters worse, federal drug forfeiture laws allow state and local law enforcement agencies to keep for their own use 80% of the cash, cars, and homes seized from drug suspects, thus granting law enforcement a direct monetary interest in the profitability of the drug market. The results have been predictable: people of color rounded up en masse for relatively minor, non-violent drug offenses. In 2005, four out of five drug arrests were for possession, only one out of five for sales. Most people in state prison have no history of violence or even of significant selling activity. In fact, during the 1990s – the period of the most dramatic expansion of the drug war – nearly 80% of the increase in drug arrests was for marijuana possession, a drug generally considered less harmful than alcohol or tobacco and at least as prevalent in middle-class white communities as in the inner city. In this way, a new racial under-caste has been created in an astonishingly short period of time – a new Jim Crow system. Millions of people of color are now saddled with criminal records and legally denied the very rights that their parents and grandparents fought for (and in some cases, died for). Affirmative action, though, has put a happy face on this racial reality. Seeing black people graduate from Harvard and Yale and become CEO's or corporate lawyers – not to mention the current president of the United States – causes us all to marvel at what a long way we’ve come. Recent data shows, though, that much of black progress is a myth. In many respects, African Americans are doing no better than they were when Martin Luther King, Jr. was assassinated and uprisings swept inner cities across America. The black child poverty rate is actually higher now than it was then. Unemployment rates in black communities rival those in Third World countries. And that’s with affirmative action! When we pull back the curtain and take a look at what our “colorblind” society creates without affirmative action, we see a familiar social, political, and economic structure: the structure of racial caste. The entrance into this new caste system can be found at the prison gate. This is not Martin Luther King, Jr.’s dream. This is not the promised land. The cyclical rebirth of caste in America is a recurring racial nightmare.


In a report published by reporter Tom McCarthy in The Guardian on Wednesday March 4th, 2015, police have killed more than twice as many people as reported by US government. According to this report, an average of 545 people killed by local and state law enforcement officers in the US went uncounted in the country’s most authoritative crime statistics every year for almost a decade. The first-ever attempt by US record-keepers to estimate the number of uncounted “law enforcement homicides” exposed previous official tallies as capturing less than half of the real picture. The new estimate – an average of 928 people killed by police annually over eight recent years, compared to 383 in published FBI data for the same time period – amounted to a more glaring admission than ever before of the government’s failure to track how many people police kill. 


The revelation called into particular question the FBI practice of publishing annual totals of “justifiable homicides by law enforcement” – tallies that are widely cited in the media and elsewhere as the most accurate official count of police homicides. This bureau of justice statistics (BJS) report, produced in collaboration with RTI International, the research institute, explodes the notion – if its findings are accurate – that the figures the FBI publishes annually are anything other than hugely misleading. The data underlying the FBI tally “is estimated to cover 46% of officer-involved homicides at best” for the years 2003-2009 and 2011, the BJS report concluded. But the published FBI tallies cover even fewer of the total deaths, closer to 41%, in part because the FBI publishes no data from Florida. A separate tally of “arrest-related deaths”, conducted by BJS itself, was slightly more accurate for the years in question, capturing 49% of law enforcement homicides, at best, the report found. The report estimated “an average of 928 law enforcement homicides per year” for the years in question, suggesting that the FBI’s published count of 414 such deaths in 2009, for example, might be 124% off, while its count of 347 such deaths in 2005 might be 167% off. The years under study saw several high-profile homicides by law enforcement of unarmed civilians, such as the 2009 shooting of Oscar Grant in a train station in Oakland, California – an episode that would become the subject of the award-winning film “Fruit vale Station” – and the 2006 killing of Sean Bell, who died in a hail of 50 bullets outside a nightclub in Queens, New York. But the majority of victims in law enforcement homicides for those years not only went unnamed – they went uncounted in any one tally. Even the two counting systems combined, as overseen by the FBI and BJS, missed an average of 263 homicides by law enforcement each year, BJS found.


Academics and specialists have long been aware of flaws in the FBI numbers, which are based on voluntary submissions by local law enforcement agencies of paperwork known as supplementary homicide reports. No law requires local agencies to fill out the reports, and some agencies do not, especially not for officer-involved homicides, according to experts who have studied the issue. But no accredited source had publicly ventured to claim that the numbers published by the FBI were more than 100% wrong. That’s notwithstanding an unusually public airing of doubts about the numbers by the FBI director, James Comey, in a 2015 speech at Georgetown University. “It’s ridiculous that I can’t tell you how many people were shot by the police in this country – last week, last year, the last decade – it’s ridiculous,” Comey said. While the FBI and other government tallies have long been criticized for under-reporting, an admission of the problem at the top levels of US government is swiftly emerging. Joining Comey and Obama this year has been the outgoing attorney general, Eric Holder, who in January 2016 called the government’s accounting for use of force “unacceptable”. In a highly anticipated investigation of its own, Holder’s Justice Department released a report the following Wednesday that African Americans were subject to a full 88% of use-of-force cases actually documented by the police in Ferguson, Mo., according to a law enforcement official familiar with the department’s findings.


I have presented everything in this book the way I have to reveal the government's not-so-surprising rationale for America's extremist drug laws – race. The first anti-drug law in our country was a local law in San Francisco passed in 1875. It outlawed the smoking of opium and was directed at the Chinese because opium smoking was a peculiarly Chinese habit. It was believed that Chinese men were luring white women to have sex in opium dens. In 1909 Congress made opium smoking a federal offense by enacting the Anti-Opium Act. It reinforced Chinese racism by carving out an exception for drinking and injecting tinctures of opiates that were popular among whites. Cocaine regulations also were triggered by racial prejudice. Cocaine use was associated with African-Americans just as opium use was associated with the Chinese. Newspaper articles bore racially charged headlines linking cocaine with violent, anti-social behavior by blacks. A 1914 New York Times article proclaimed: "Negro Cocaine 'Fiends' Are a New Southern Menace: Murder and Insanity Increasing Among Lower Class Blacks Because They Have Taken to 'Sniffing.'" A Literary Digest article from the same year claimed that "most of the attacks upon women in the South are the direct result of the cocaine-crazed Negro brain." It comes as no surprise that 1914 was also the year Congress passed the Harrison Tax Act, effectively outlawing opium and cocaine.


Marijuana prohibition also had racist underpinnings. This time it was the Mexicans. Just as cocaine was associated with black violence and irrational behavior, in the southwest border towns marijuana was viewed -- beginning in the early 1920s -- as a cause of Mexican lawlessness. A Texas police captain from that time period suggested that marijuana gave Mexicans superhuman strength to commit acts of violence: “Under marijuana Mexicans [become] very violent, especially when they become angry and will attack an officer even if a gun is drawn on him. They seem to have no fear. I have also noted that under the influence of this weed they have enormous strength and it will take several men to handle one man while, under ordinary circumstances, one man could handle him with ease.” The American Coalition – an anti-immigrant group – claimed as recently as 1980: "Marijuana, perhaps now the most insidious of narcotics, is a direct byproduct of unrestricted Mexican immigration."


Since then Congress has enacted a spate of comprehensive anti-drug laws with strict penalties. For example, today one can be sentenced to life for distributing one kilogram of heroin; 40 years for distributing 100 grams, and 20 years for distributing any quantity at all. Nevertheless, this has not stemmed the country's appetite for illicit drugs in spite of every administration's continued "war on drugs" since President Nixon established the Drug Enforcement Agency in 1972, which has grown through the years to a staff of almost 10,000 employees and a budget of $2 billion annually. According to data from the 2010 National Household Survey on Drug Use and Health, almost 120 million Americans 12 or older – roughly 47 percent of that population – reported illicit drug use at least once in their lifetime; 15.3 percent admitted to using an illegal drug in the prior year; and 8.9 percent – roughly 23 million people – did it within the prior month. The New York Times recently reported that one out of every 15 high school students smokes marijuana on a nearly daily basis. When it comes to sentencing, the main culprit is drugs. About half of the roughly 220,000 criminals in the federal prisons have either brought them into our country, have distributed them here, or have otherwise associated themselves with this illicit activity. This means that probably half of the $6.8 billion of the Bureau of Prisons budget is eaten up by incarcerating the criminal druggies. Half of the prison population is there because of drugs, costing us billions of dollars a year to keep them in jail.

Buy direct (print edition reduced to $9.95, 200 pages) at http://www.pcmatl.org/#!books-and-donations/c17et
 
 
 
Get it on Smashwords.com (all Apple/Mac devices, Nook, Kobo, Fire and more) at https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/666084