This is the bi-weekly blog from Author Rev. Paul J. Bern and Progressive Christian Ministries of Greater Atlanta. What's a Progressive Christian? It means Christianity without the dogma, and faith without the spiritual pollution of conservative politics. So this is nondenominational Christianity viewed from a somewhat leftist perspective, which is far closer to what Jesus originally taught, than the ultra-conservative viewpoint being taught today.
Faith-based nonfiction books by Rev. Paul J. Bern
Thursday, February 28, 2019
Ongoing Bible study this week will be part 3 of Acts chapter 20
Friday, February 22, 2019
Thursday, February 21, 2019
Monday, February 18, 2019
Monday, February 11, 2019
To tithe or not to tithe: That is the question
This week on the Progressive Christian Blog with Author & Web Minister Paul J. Bern; to tithe or not to tithe: that is the question -- https://zurl.co/O6Xn #tithing #theRealBible #ProgressiveChristian
(Please note: This weekly blog will be redirected to my website starting today, going forward. At the end, for those who feel led by the Spirit to contribute, please click the 'donate' button in the lower right corner of the web-page. Thanks very much!)
(Please note: This weekly blog will be redirected to my website starting today, going forward. At the end, for those who feel led by the Spirit to contribute, please click the 'donate' button in the lower right corner of the web-page. Thanks very much!)
Friday, February 8, 2019
This week's ongoing BIble study will be part 4 of Acts chapter 19
The
Apostle Paul Evades the Angry Mob at Ephesus, or,
How
Spiritual Warfare Can Break Out at Any Moment
[Acts
chapter 19, verses 32-41]
by
Minister Paul J. Bern
Last
week when we left off at verse 31 of Acts chapter 19, we found the
apostle Paul being restrained by his Christian brothers from going
out and trying to reason with a crowd of tens of thousands, having
been persuaded to attempt no such thing lest he be crushed or
otherwise killed by this angry mob that had formed. At this point,
Paul had been in Ephesus for some time, having founded and built a
church there that was growing each week. But there were no pro audio
systems available to Paul, or anyone else for 19 more centuries. Paul
had absolutely no chance of telling the crowd what he wanted to say,
which simply was, “Jesus is Lord over all.” Yet he wanted to try
anyway, and that's where we will begin part four of Acts chapter 19.
“32) The assembly was in
confusion: Some were shouting one thing, some another. Most of the
people did not even know why they were there. 33) The Jews in the
crowd pushed Alexander to the front, and they shouted instructions to
him. He motioned for silence in order to make a defense before the
people. 34) But when they realized he was a Jew, they all shouted in
unison for about two hours: 'Great is Artemis of the Ephesians!' 35)
The city clerk quieted the crowd and said: 'Fellow Ephesians, doesn’t
all the world know that the city of Ephesus is the guardian of the
temple of the great Artemis and of her image, which fell from heaven?
36) Therefore, since these facts are undeniable, you ought to calm
down and not do anything rash.'”
(Acts 19, verses 32-36)
OK, now let's think
back to how all this started. A silversmith named Demetrius made
statues and other religious relics for their god Artemis. He,
together with many other craftsmen, were evidently earning a very
comfortable living from the crafting and sale of these idols. In
other words, their religion was also a profitable enterprise, not
unlike some churches today, especially the ones that demand 10% of
the incomes of its members. So, these guys are doing just great, and
along comes Paul preaching Jesus Christ crucified, died and
resurrected, and he's converting people to Christianity left and
right. Christianity has become a threat to their livelihoods. And,
since they have the majority of the people there worshiping these
idols, everyone has been offended by Christianity. Paul and the
disciples with him were finding themselves in the middle of a virtual
hornet's nest.
It
was a mob scene that would rival any riot we could think of today.
“Most of the people did
not even know why they were there.” In
some ways that scene was similar to that of the Arab-Jew clashes in
modern Israel today. And, in the end, that's all this was –
antisemitism, as it is written, “33)
The Jews in the crowd pushed Alexander to the front, and they shouted
instructions to him. He motioned for silence in order to make a
defense before the people. 34) But when they realized he was a Jew,
they all shouted in unison for about two hours: 'Great is Artemis of
the Ephesians!'”
Alexander, you see, was from the synagogue there in Ephesus, the same
people who were so abusive towards Paul when he presented the gospel
to them that he left and went to the lecture hall at Tyrannus
instead, and where he had been based ever since. To those in the
crowd, the Jews worship of the Lord Almighty was just as much an
offense to them.
Finally,
after all the hubbub quieted down to a manageable level,
and after Alexander had been shouted down from the podium, it was the
city clerk who finally got the crowd to do some listening instead of
all their shouting about nothing. “...Fellow
Ephesians, doesn’t all the world know that the city of Ephesus is
the guardian of the temple of the great Artemis and of her image,
which fell from heaven? Therefore, since these facts are undeniable,
you ought to calm down and not do anything rash.'”
I don't know what the city clerk meant by his reference to the image
of Artemis, “who fell from heaven”. That would have to have been
either a meteorite or something like that, such as a chunk of ice,
which is rare but it does occur. I find it a strange notion that an
entire city would worship some darned space boulder, so there's
really no way to know for certain what the city clerk was referring
to.
What the city clerk
did say was that their faith in this idol they were worshiping was
beyond questioning, and so they should never, he said, have gotten so
worked up about it in the first place. The Christianity that Paul and
those with him were preaching and teaching about was being viewed as
a passing fad by the city clerk, whereas Artemis, or so they
reasoned, would be there forever. As we all now know, it was and is
very much the other way around. Artemis is a relic from ancient
history that would be completely forgotten if it weren't for Acts
chapter 19. The name of Jesus Christ, on the other hand, lives on for
all eternity. Having said that, let's move on to part 2 of this
week's study.
“37) 'You have brought these men
here, though they have neither robbed temples nor blasphemed our
goddess. 38) If, then, Demetrius and his fellow craftsmen have a
grievance against anybody, the courts are open and there are
proconsuls. They can press charges. 39) If there is anything further
you want to bring up, it must be settled in a legal assembly. 40) As
it is, we are in danger of being charged with rioting because of what
happened today. In that case we would not be able to account for this
commotion, since there is no reason for it.' 41) After he had said
this, he dismissed the assembly.”
OK,
let's all go back to our studies of chapter 18 from several weeks
ago. Remember how Paul had been previously seized by the Temple
authorities in Corinth? Gallio, the proconsul who served as the local
magistrate there, had dismissed the charges against Paul straight out
of hand (see verses 14-17) because the proceedings had been called
for a religious dispute instead of issues of legality. Here at the
conclusion of chapter 19, we find a similar occurrence in the verses
above. The city clerk, whose name is not mentioned in this case, was
clearly unhappy with what was happening, especially with all the
noise and confusion. He rebukes them all, being the sole legal
authority present: “38) If, then, Demetrius and his fellow
craftsmen have a grievance against anybody, the courts are open and
there are proconsuls. They can press charges. 39) If there is
anything further you want to bring up, it must be settled in a legal
assembly.”
The
city clerk's address to the crowd left no doubt as to who was in
charge. I would call this an example of leadership in action. Take
your demonstrations before the authorities, he ordered the crowd, and
keep them out of the streets so people can go back to work. “As
it is, we are in danger of being charged with rioting because of what
happened today. In that case we would not be able to account for this
commotion, since there is no reason for it.”
Right here is the underlying crux of the matter as far as the
Ephesian populace was concerned, and especially for that city clerk.
The place in which they were living was a part of the Roman Empire as
it existed back then. So the city clerk was admonishing the crowd by
telling them there would be hell to pay if the Romans ever found out
what had occurred. And he was absolutely right.
Next
week, as we move on to chapter 20 in this ongoing series of Biblical
studies, Paul remained in Ephesus for only a short while longer,
having realized that his days were numbered there. His very presence
for the previous 2 years, together with the evangelizing activities
of the church he had founded, were the spark that kindled the riot
that had just occurred there. The time had come for Paul to move on,
and he had by this time begun to quietly acknowledge that to himself,
and soon after to the others with who he had worked for the last 2
years. So everyone be sure and return next week for another
installment of this series on the writings of the apostle Luke, part
1 of chapter 20. I look forward to seeing you all then!
Sunday, February 3, 2019
Governor Cuomo, the Abortion Wars, and Progressive Christianity
What Does
The Bible Tell Us About Abortion?
by
Minister Paul J. Bern
For a
website view, click
here :-)
Without
a doubt, this week's commentary is inspired by what transpired this
past week in the state of New York, where the abortion law has been
amended to legalize abortion right up until the point of birth. The
law expands the state’s already liberal abortion laws to allow
late-term abortions when “the patient is within 24 weeks from the
commencement of pregnancy, or there is an absence of fetal viability,
or the abortion is necessary to protect the patient’s life or
health.” I offer this
quote from the Philadelphia Inquirer as further explanation: “The
law passed this week makes it impossible for the government to
prevent a woman from choosing an abortion during the first six
months. The state cannot step in to stop her. This could be
catastrophic. Imagine if women in America could wait up to six months
to choose to abort their babies for issues.... less devastating than
Down syndrome. What if a woman chose to abort because she wanted a
boy instead of a girl? That’s feasible under Cuomo’s law.”
The
article continues: “The law also legalizes abortion up to the
moment of birth if the mother’s life is in danger. In short: The
law values the life of the mother more than the life of the child.”
As this was being signed
into law by governor Andrew Cuomo, the governor stated he “was
opposed to abortion personally, but would not deprive others of that
'right.'” By the way, Andrew Cuomo is a Catholic. The Catholic
church is by and large opposed to abortion, but usually for the wrong
reasons. A prevented abortion becomes a new Catholic convert. That
means more members, more robust Sunday collections during mass, and
more priests and nuns for the Vatican to recruit.
Many
people presume that a human being is created at the time of
conception, but this belief is not supported medically or by the
Bible. The fact that a living sperm penetrates a living ovum
resulting in the formation of a living fetus does not mean that the
fetus is a living human being, or at least not immediately. According
to the Bible, a fetus is not a living person with a soul until after
drawing its first breath. Allow me to explain the results of my
research on this very touchy subject as delicately as possible.
First
of all, God formed man according to Genesis 2:7, which says, “...
the Lord formed man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his
nostrils the breath of life, and man became a living being”.
Although the man was fully formed by God in all respects, he was not
a living being until after God put breath into him. In Job 33:4, it
states: “The spirit of God has made me, and the breath of the
Almighty gives me life.” We were all formed prior to our birth,
but we weren't living beings until God breathed life unto us.
Again, to quote Ezekiel 37 verses 5 and 6, “This
is what the Sovereign Lord says to these bones: 'I will make breath
to enter you, and you will come to life. I will attach tendons to
you, and make flesh to come upon you and cover you with skin; and put
breath in you, and you will come to life. Then you will know that I
am the Lord'.”
The
Bible also spells out the appropriate level of punishment for those
who would dare to hurt the unborn. In Exodus 21:22 it is written: “If
men who are fighting hit a pregnant woman and she gives birth
prematurely but there is no serious injury, the offender must be
fined whatever the woman's husband demands and the court allows. But
if there is serious injury, you are to take life for life, eye for
eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, burn for burn,
wound for wound, and bruise for bruise”. It should be quite
clear from this that the aborted fetus is not considered a living
human being since the resulting punishment for the abortion is
nothing more than a fine; it is not classified by the Bible as a
capital offense under these circumstances unless the baby, its
mother, or both are intentionally harmed or killed.
It is
further stated in 1st Corinthians chapter 3 verse 16,
“Don't you know that you yourselves are God's temple and God's
Spirit lives in you?” We are only alive in Christ when we die
to ourselves. An unborn fetus lives within the womb, but is not yet a
human being until it draws its first breath. Can God live within the
unborn baby? Well, the Bible does say, “All things are possible
with God”, that is true and I believe it wholeheartedly. But as I
have already pointed out, the Bible is absolutely clear that a baby
is not a human being until it draws its first breath, so that
question is actually besides the point. The physical body of the
unborn fetus is surely there, but as before, that body isn't
breathing yet.
Destroying
a living fetus does not equate to killing a grown, living human being
even though the fetus definitely has the potential of becoming a
human being. One can not kill something that has not been born or
taken a breath. This means that a stillborn would not be considered a
human being either. Of course, every living sperm has the potential
of becoming a human being although not even one in a million will
make it; the rest are aborted. It would appear that God does not have
any more regard for the loss of a sperm than he does for the loss of
a placenta, or of a foreskin during circumcision, despite the fact
that these were living tissue as the result of conception.
Now
let's take this to the next level, which has to do with being born
again in the Spirit. When Jesus taught Nicodemus about being born
again he said, “I tell you the truth, no one can enter the
kingdom of God unless he is born of the water and of the Spirit.
Flesh gives birth to flesh, and spirit gives birth to Spirit. You
should not be surprised at my saying, 'you must be born again'. The
wind blows wherever it pleases. You hear its sound, but you cannot
tell where it comes from or where it is going. So it is with everyone
born of the Spirit.” (John chapter 3, verses 5-8)
Flesh
gives birth to flesh, and spirit to Spirit. Being born of the water
is a reference to childbirth first and to water baptism secondly.
Being born of the Spirit of Christ refers to the baptism of the Holy
Spirit. Plus, when we read our Bible, it says quite clearly in
Galatians chapter two and verse 20, “I have been crucified with
Christ and I no longer live, but Christ lives in me”. If the
apostle Paul has been crucified with Jesus and died with him, then we
are charged with the duty of being followers of Jesus right up to the
very end as well. This is what being born again actually means.
In a
number of versions of the Bible, one of the commandments in Exodus 20
that was spoken by God to Moses states: “You shall not kill”.
According to the Mosaic text, this should read “You must not
murder”, since the Bible has commandments stating that people shall
be put to death for a number of different offenses. Exodus 21:17
states: “Whoever curses his father or mother shall be put to
death.” There are also other capital offenses listed in Exodus
21. The popular ten commandments (in the original text there are over
600 of them) that are enumerated in Exodus 20 were given by God to
Moses on tablets of stone. Verse 13 simply says, “You shall not
murder”. That sums it up very nicely, I think. There is nothing in
the Bible to indicate that a fetus is considered to be anything other
than living tissue and, according to Scripture, it does not become a
living being until after it has taken its first breath. Meaning,
abortion is not necessarily murder.
Those
who say, "If you're a Christian, you have to be against
abortion, support our troops no matter what their mission, and
therefore you must also vote conservative Republican," are
simply reciting talking points from false teachers. There are a
disturbing number of these people who have infiltrated the Church who
are doing this very thing. Many cite the scripture found in Jeremiah
1:5, "Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, before you
were born I set you apart; I appointed you as a prophet to the
nations." God is omnipotent. He has known all of us since
before creation. In Numbers 5 describes "the Lord" ordering
an abortion. It's clearly stated in verse 22, "May this water
that brings a curse enter your body so that your abdomen swells or
your womb miscarries." Many argue that this is a
misinterpretation, but I'm not so sure about that. It is better to
err on the side of caution with regard to the Lord than not. Before
false teachers turned the issue of reproductive choice into a
political football, views on this matter were far less extreme.
Does
this mean I am pro-life or pro-choice? Sorry, but I will not allow
anyone to label and compartmentalize me like that. In many cases, I
think that if the mother does not want the baby then she should put
the child up for adoption. On that topic, why do women get pregnant
in the first place? Often it's due to lack of access to birth
control. The cure is national health insurance, such as Medicare for
all which would include access to prescription drugs at minimal cost.
You know, like birth control pills or other contraceptives?
In
cases where abortion is necessary, such as when the baby is already
dead before birth, in cases of rape or incest, or when the mother's
life is in jeopardy, in those events an abortion should be performed
by qualified medical personnel or under a doctor's direct
supervision. But those are the only exceptions. In the end, if
abortion was such a grievous sin Jesus would have mentioned it. He
never did. While I am personally against abortion, I do not presume
to tell women what they can or cannot do to or with their bodies.
Enough said!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)